On Thu, 01 Mar 2007 17:23:23 +0800 "Wu, Bryan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 00:54 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 01 Mar 2007 12:15:29 +0800 "Wu, Bryan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 
> > > +/* check if the mac in reg is valid */
> > > +#define SMC_GET_MAC_ADDR(addr)                                   \
> > > + do {                                                    \
> > > +         unsigned int __v;                               \
> > > +         __v = SMC_inw( ioaddr, ADDR0_REG );             \
> > > +         addr[0] = __v; addr[1] = __v >> 8;              \
> > > +         __v = SMC_inw( ioaddr, ADDR1_REG );             \
> > > +         addr[2] = __v; addr[3] = __v >> 8;              \
> > > +         __v = SMC_inw( ioaddr, ADDR2_REG );             \
> > > +         addr[4] = __v; addr[5] = __v >> 8;              \
> > > +         if (*(u32 *)(&addr[0]) == 0xFFFFFFFF) {         \
> > > +                 random_ether_addr(addr);                \
> > > +         }                                               \
> > > + } while (0)
> > 
> > Please follow kernel coding style:
> > 
> >     __v = SMC_inw(ioaddr, ADDR2_REG);
> > 

You skipped this:

> > Can this not be implemented as a C function?

> +#define SMC_GET_MAC_ADDR(addr)                                       \
> +     do {                                                    \
> +             unsigned int __v;                               \
> +             __v = SMC_inw(ioaddr, ADDR0_REG);               \
> +             addr[0] = __v; addr[1] = __v >> 8;              \
> +             __v = SMC_inw(ioaddr, ADDR1_REG);               \
> +             addr[2] = __v; addr[3] = __v >> 8;              \
> +             __v = SMC_inw(ioaddr, ADDR2_REG);               \
> +             addr[4] = __v; addr[5] = __v >> 8;              \
> +             if (*(u32 *)(&addr[0]) == 0xFFFFFFFF) {         \
> +                     random_ether_addr(addr);                \
> +             }                                               \
> +     } while (0)

It can be, I think...

Please always prefer coding in C over coding in cpp.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to