> On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 23:06:21 +0300 Oleg Nesterov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> page_lock_anon_vma() uses spin_lock() to block RCU. This doesn't work with
> PREEMPT_RCU, we have to do rcu_read_lock() explicitely. Otherwise, it is
> theoretically possible that slab returns anon_vma's memory to the system
> before we do spin_unlock(&anon_vma->lock).
>
> ...
>
> +static void page_unlock_anon_vma(struct anon_vma *anon_vma)
> +{
> + spin_unlock(&anon_vma->lock);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> }
It's a bit sad doing a double preempt_disable() for non-PREEMPT_RCU builds.
Perhaps we would benefit from a new rcu_read_lock_preempt_rcu() which is a
no-op if !PREEMPT_RCU.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
