H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > By author: Claus Assmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > > > Why does Linux report a LA of 10 if there are only two processes > > running? > > > > Load Average = runnable processes (R) + processes in disk wait (D). Keep in mind that on some operating systems, sometimes processes become STUCK in "short disk wait". That may mean that if you just discard those processes (they won't do any useful work until you reboot the system), you will see the load average one point higher than what should be expected. This is almost always a bug somewhere. So, if you're not actually loading the machine with 12 processes doing disk IO, and still seeing a load of 12, chances are that there are processes stuck in the (D) state. That's a bug. Report the bug. Roger. -- ** [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2137555 ** *-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --* * Common sense is the collection of * ****** prejudices acquired by age eighteen. -- Albert Einstein ******** - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: sendmail fails to deliver mail... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: sendmail fails to deliver ... Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: sendmail fails to deliver mail with attachm... Ralf Baechle
- Re: sendmail fails to deliver mail with att... H. Peter Anvin
- Re: sendmail fails to deliver mail with att... Mohammad A. Haque
- (non)importance of loadaverages bert hubert
- Re: sendmail fails to deliver mail with attachments in /... David Lang
- Re: sendmail fails to deliver mail with attachments... Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: sendmail fails to deliver mail with attachments... Claus Assmann
- Re: sendmail fails to deliver mail with attachm... H. Peter Anvin
- [OFF] Load avarage (Re: sendmail fails to d... Rogier Wolff
- [OFF] Load avarage (Re: sendmail fails to deliv... Kari E. Hurtta
- Wild thangs, was: sendmail fails to deliver mail with at... David Ford
- Re: Wild thangs, was: sendmail fails to deliver mai... Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: Wild thangs, was: sendmail fails to deliver... David Ford
- Re: Wild thangs, was: sendmail fails to del... Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: Wild thangs, was: sendmail fails to... David Ford
- Re: Wild thangs, was: sendmail fails to... Andrew Morton
- Re: Wild thangs, was: sendmail fai... Andrew Morton
- Re: Wild thangs, was: sendmail fails to deliver mai... H. Peter Anvin
- Re: [OT] Wild thangs, was: sendmail fails to delive... Bruce Guenter