Hi Matt,

Patch applied.

Thanks,
Jacek Anaszewski

On 10/13/2016 03:16 PM, Matt Ranostay wrote:
PCA9632TK part seems to incorrectly blink at ~1.3x of the programmed
rate. This patchset add a nxp,period-scale devicetree property to
adjust for this misconfiguration.

Cc: Tony Lindgren <t...@atomide.com>
Cc: Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszew...@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Ranostay <matt@ranostay.consulting>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/pca963x.txt |  3 +++
 drivers/leds/leds-pca963x.c                        | 18 +++++++++++++++---
 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/pca963x.txt 
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/pca963x.txt
index dafbe9931c2b..dfbdb123a9bf 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/pca963x.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/pca963x.txt
@@ -7,6 +7,9 @@ Optional properties:
 - nxp,totem-pole : use totem pole (push-pull) instead of open-drain (pca9632 
defaults
   to open-drain, newer chips to totem pole)
 - nxp,hw-blink : use hardware blinking instead of software blinking
+- nxp,period-scale : In some configurations, the chip blinks faster than 
expected.
+                    This parameter provides a scaling ratio (fixed point, 
decimal divided
+                    by 1000) to compensate, e.g. 1300=1.3x and 750=0.75x.

 Each led is represented as a sub-node of the nxp,pca963x device.

diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-pca963x.c b/drivers/leds/leds-pca963x.c
index 407eba11e187..b6ce1f2ec33e 100644
--- a/drivers/leds/leds-pca963x.c
+++ b/drivers/leds/leds-pca963x.c
@@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ struct pca963x_chipdef {
        u8                      grpfreq;
        u8                      ledout_base;
        int                     n_leds;
+       unsigned int            scaling;
 };

 static struct pca963x_chipdef pca963x_chipdefs[] = {
@@ -189,6 +190,14 @@ static int pca963x_led_set(struct led_classdev *led_cdev,
        return pca963x_brightness(pca963x, value);
 }

+static unsigned int pca963x_period_scale(struct pca963x_led *pca963x,
+       unsigned int val)
+{
+       unsigned int scaling = pca963x->chip->chipdef->scaling;
+
+       return scaling ? DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(val * scaling, 1000) : val;
+}
+
 static int pca963x_blink_set(struct led_classdev *led_cdev,
                unsigned long *delay_on, unsigned long *delay_off)
 {
@@ -207,14 +216,14 @@ static int pca963x_blink_set(struct led_classdev 
*led_cdev,
                time_off = 500;
        }

-       period = time_on + time_off;
+       period = pca963x_period_scale(pca963x, time_on + time_off);

        /* If period not supported by hardware, default to someting sane. */
        if ((period < PCA963X_BLINK_PERIOD_MIN) ||
            (period > PCA963X_BLINK_PERIOD_MAX)) {
                time_on = 500;
                time_off = 500;
-               period = time_on + time_off;
+               period = pca963x_period_scale(pca963x, 1000);
        }

        /*
@@ -222,7 +231,7 @@ static int pca963x_blink_set(struct led_classdev *led_cdev,
         *      (time_on / period) = (GDC / 256) ->
         *              GDC = ((time_on * 256) / period)
         */
-       gdc = (time_on * 256) / period;
+       gdc = (pca963x_period_scale(pca963x, time_on) * 256) / period;

        /*
         * From manual: period = ((GFRQ + 1) / 24) in seconds.
@@ -294,6 +303,9 @@ pca963x_dt_init(struct i2c_client *client, struct 
pca963x_chipdef *chip)
        else
                pdata->blink_type = PCA963X_SW_BLINK;

+       if (of_property_read_u32(np, "nxp,period-scale", &chip->scaling))
+               chip->scaling = 1000;
+
        return pdata;
 }




--
Best regards,
Jacek Anaszewski

Reply via email to