On x86, the cw1200 driver produces a rather silly warning about the
possible use of the 'ret' variable without an initialization
presumably after being confused by the architecture specific definition
of WARN_ON:
drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/wsm.c: In function ‘wsm_handle_rx’:
drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/wsm.c:1457:9: error: ‘ret’ may be used
uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
As the driver just checks the same variable twice here, we can simplify
it by removing the second condition, which makes it more readable and
avoids the warning.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
---
drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/wsm.c | 15 +++++++--------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/wsm.c
b/drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/wsm.c
index 680d60eabc75..094e6637ade2 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/wsm.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/wsm.c
@@ -385,14 +385,13 @@ static int wsm_multi_tx_confirm(struct cw1200_common
*priv,
if (WARN_ON(count <= 0))
return -EINVAL;
- if (count > 1) {
- /* We already released one buffer, now for the rest */
- ret = wsm_release_tx_buffer(priv, count - 1);
- if (ret < 0)
- return ret;
- else if (ret > 0)
- cw1200_bh_wakeup(priv);
- }
+ /* We already released one buffer, now for the rest */
+ ret = wsm_release_tx_buffer(priv, count - 1);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+
+ if (ret > 0)
+ cw1200_bh_wakeup(priv);
cw1200_debug_txed_multi(priv, count);
for (i = 0; i < count; ++i) {
--
2.9.0
