* Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> wrote:
> Also, the evtest_kevent_remove call is superfluous with epoll.
it's only used in the error path AFAICS.
but you are right about evserver_epoll/kevent.c incorrectly assuming
that things wont block in evtest_callback_client(), which, after
receiving the "there's stuff on the input socket" event does:
recvmsg(sock),
fd = open();
sendfile(sock, fd)
close(fd);
while evserver_threadlet.c, even this naive implementation, does not
assume that we wont block in that function.
> In any case, comparing epoll/kevent with 100K active sessions, against
> threadlets, is not exactly a fair/appropriate test for it.
fully agreed.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
