Hi Boris, > > > > Could you be more specific here? > > > > As I mentioned before, the problem is not with the lack of > > "atomic" API. > > Below is a quick and dirty I made on top of this patch to show you how > atomic update can be implemented in this driver.
Thank you for example patch. I will implement the ->apply() callback and post patches very soon :-). I had two issues with the ->apply() implementation: - Do my work on top of this patch (https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/10/7/454 as you did) to avoid rewriting work already done. - In the example ->apply() implementation for rockchip (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/7228221/) the ->config() callback was not removed when ->apply() was implemented. I was confused with such approach, but as you explained in this mail, the solely ->apply() is enough. > It's not tested, and > probably not working, but it should give you a better idea of what is > expected. Thanks for explanation, Łukasz Majewski
pgplQhSQ8CesH.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
