On 10 Nov 2000 17:10:00 -0800, "H. Peter Anvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >We can mess with the ABI, but it requires a wholescale rev of the >entire system. AFAICT, there is nothing stopping us from redoing the kernel ABI to pass the first few parameters between kernel functions in registers. As long as the syscall interface is unchanged, that ABI change will only break binary modules (care_factor == 0). The ABI type would need to be added to the symbol version prefix, trivial. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Where is it written? George Anzinger
- Re: Where is it written? Michael Meissner
- Re: Where is it written? Albert D. Cahalan
- Re: Where is it written? Michael Meissner
- Re: Where is it written? H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Where is it written? Keith Owens
- Re: Where is it written? H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Where is it written? Richard Henderson
- Re: Where is it written? Michael Meissner
- Re: Where is it written? Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: Where is it written? Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: Where is it written? Peter Samuelson
- Re: Where is it written? H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Where is it written? Peter Samuelson
- Re: Where is it written? H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Where is it written? Peter Samuelson