On 10/20/2016 05:04 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 10/20, Sarangdhar Joshi wrote:
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.anders...@linaro.org>

Add SMEM and TCSR DT nodes on MSM8996.

Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.anders...@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sarangdhar Joshi <spjo...@codeaurora.org>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi 
b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi
index 949b096..abc1089 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi
@@ -164,17 +164,36 @@

        };

+       tcsr_mutex: hwlock {
+               compatible = "qcom,tcsr-mutex";
+               syscon = <&tcsr_mutex_regs 0 0x1000>;
+               #hwlock-cells = <1>;
+       };
+
        psci {
                compatible = "arm,psci-1.0";
                method = "smc";
        };

+       smem {
+               compatible = "qcom,smem";
+
+               memory-region = <&smem_mem>;
+
+               hwlocks = <&tcsr_mutex 3>;

Super nitpick: Is there a reason we have newlines between
everything in this node? This node is the only one that isn't
consistent.

Thanks, will do that. I think I just missed updating this node from original patchset.




--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Reply via email to