Hi,

On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 02:17:09AM +0800, fu....@linaro.org wrote:
> diff --git a/include/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h 
> b/include/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h
> index caedb74..6f06481 100644
> --- a/include/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h
> +++ b/include/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h
> @@ -19,6 +19,9 @@

Please add:

#include <linux/bitops.h>

... immediately before the includes below; it's needed to ensure that
BIT() is defined in all cases. Previously we were relying on implicit
header includes, which is not good practice.

>  #include <linux/timecounter.h>
>  #include <linux/types.h>
>  
> +#define ARCH_CP15_TIMER                      BIT(0)
> +#define ARCH_MEM_TIMER                       BIT(1)

If we're going to expose these in a header, it would be better to rename
them to something that makes their usage/meaning clear. These should
probably be ARCH_TIMER_TYPE_{CP15,MEM}.

I guess this can wait for subsequent cleanup.

> +enum ppi_nr {
> +     PHYS_SECURE_PPI,
> +     PHYS_NONSECURE_PPI,
> +     VIRT_PPI,
> +     HYP_PPI,
> +     MAX_TIMER_PPI
> +};

Please rename this to arch_timer_ppi_nr (updating the single user in 
drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c). That'll avoid the potential for
name clashes in files this happens to get included in (potentially
transitively via other headers).

With those changes (regardless of the ARCH_TIMER_TYPE_* bits):

Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutl...@arm.com>

Thanks,
Mark.

> +
>  #define ARCH_TIMER_PHYS_ACCESS               0
>  #define ARCH_TIMER_VIRT_ACCESS               1
>  #define ARCH_TIMER_MEM_PHYS_ACCESS   2
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 

Reply via email to