Could someone push this please?

On 20/09/2016 19:39, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> Fix struct seccomp_filter and seccomp_run_filters() signatures.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <m...@digikod.net>
> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <l...@amacapital.net>
> Cc: James Morris <jmor...@namei.org>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org>
> Cc: Will Drewry <w...@chromium.org>
> ---
>  kernel/seccomp.c | 7 +++----
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/seccomp.c b/kernel/seccomp.c
> index 0db7c8a2afe2..494cba230ca0 100644
> --- a/kernel/seccomp.c
> +++ b/kernel/seccomp.c
> @@ -41,8 +41,7 @@
>   *         outside of a lifetime-guarded section.  In general, this
>   *         is only needed for handling filters shared across tasks.
>   * @prev: points to a previously installed, or inherited, filter
> - * @len: the number of instructions in the program
> - * @insnsi: the BPF program instructions to evaluate
> + * @prog: the BPF program to evaluate
>   *
>   * seccomp_filter objects are organized in a tree linked via the @prev
>   * pointer.  For any task, it appears to be a singly-linked list starting
> @@ -168,8 +167,8 @@ static int seccomp_check_filter(struct sock_filter 
> *filter, unsigned int flen)
>  }
>  
>  /**
> - * seccomp_run_filters - evaluates all seccomp filters against @syscall
> - * @syscall: number of the current system call
> + * seccomp_run_filters - evaluates all seccomp filters against @sd
> + * @sd: optional seccomp data to be passed to filters
>   *
>   * Returns valid seccomp BPF response codes.
>   */
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to