> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] tmp/tpm_crb: fix Intel PTT hw bug during idle state
>
> On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 04:56:39PM +0000, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 02:27:06PM +0000, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 02:59:37PM +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> > > > > > From: "Winkler, Tomas" <tomas.wink...@intel.com>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > There is a HW bug in Skylake, Kabylake, and Broxton PCH Intel
> > > > > > PTT device, where most of the registers in the control area
> > > > > > except START, REQUEST, CANCEL, and LOC_CTRL lost retention
> > > > > > when the device is in the
> > > > > idle state.
> > > > > > Hence we need to bring the device to ready state before
> > > > > > accessing the other registers. The fix brings device to ready
> > > > > > state before trying to read command and response buffer
> > > > > > addresses in order to remap the for
> > > > > access.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Tomas Winkler <tomas.wink...@intel.com>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > > V2: cmd read need to be called also before crb_init as this
> > > > > > will run self test.
> > > > > > V3: resend.
> > > > > > V4: add Kabylake to the list of effected platforms
> > > > > >
> > > > > > drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c | 47
> > > > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> > > > > > 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c
> > > > > > b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c index 0f3b3f3d12d3..4eb96b85c653
> > > > > > 100644
> > > > > > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c
> > > > > > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c
> > > > > > @@ -319,6 +319,7 @@ static int crb_map_io(struct acpi_device
> > > > > > *device,
> > > > > struct crb_priv *priv,
> > > > > > struct list_head resources;
> > > > > > struct resource io_res;
> > > > > > struct device *dev = &device->dev;
> > > > > > + u32 pa_high, pa_low;
> > > > > > u64 cmd_pa;
> > > > > > u32 cmd_size;
> > > > > > u64 rsp_pa;
> > > > > > @@ -346,12 +347,27 @@ static int crb_map_io(struct acpi_device
> > > > > > *device,
> > > > > struct crb_priv *priv,
> > > > > > if (IS_ERR(priv->cca))
> > > > > > return PTR_ERR(priv->cca);
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - cmd_pa = ((u64) ioread32(&priv->cca->cmd_pa_high) << 32) |
> > > > > > - (u64) ioread32(&priv->cca->cmd_pa_low);
> > > > > > + /*
> > > > > > + * PTT HW bug w/a: wake up the device to access
> > > > > > + * possibly not retained registers.
> > > > > > + */
> > > > > > + ret = crb_cmd_ready(dev, priv);
> > > > > > + if (ret)
> > > > > > + return ret;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + pa_high = ioread32(&priv->cca->cmd_pa_high);
> > > > > > + pa_low = ioread32(&priv->cca->cmd_pa_low);
> > > > > > + cmd_pa = ((u64)pa_high << 32) | pa_low;
> > > > > > cmd_size = ioread32(&priv->cca->cmd_size);
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + dev_dbg(dev, "cmd_hi = %X cmd_low = %X cmd_size %X\n",
> > > > > > + pa_high, pa_low, cmd_size);
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > priv->cmd = crb_map_res(dev, priv, &io_res, cmd_pa,
> cmd_size);
> > > > > > - if (IS_ERR(priv->cmd))
> > > > > > - return PTR_ERR(priv->cmd);
> > > > > > + if (IS_ERR(priv->cmd)) {
> > > > > > + ret = PTR_ERR(priv->cmd);
> > > > > > + goto out;
> > > > > > + }
> > > > > >
> > > > > > memcpy_fromio(&rsp_pa, &priv->cca->rsp_pa, 8);
> > > > > > rsp_pa = le64_to_cpu(rsp_pa); @@ -359,7 +375,8 @@ static
> int
> > > > > > crb_map_io(struct acpi_device *device, struct crb_priv *priv,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > if (cmd_pa != rsp_pa) {
> > > > > > priv->rsp = crb_map_res(dev, priv, &io_res, rsp_pa,
> rsp_size);
> > > > > > - return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(priv->rsp);
> > > > > > + ret = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(priv->rsp);
> > > > > > + goto out;
> > > > > > }
> > > > > >
> > > > > > /* According to the PTP specification, overlapping command
> > > > > > and response @@ -367,12 +384,18 @@ static int
> > > > > > crb_map_io(struct acpi_device
> > > > > *device, struct crb_priv *priv,
> > > > > > */
> > > > > > if (cmd_size != rsp_size) {
> > > > > > dev_err(dev, FW_BUG "overlapping command and
> response
> > > > > buffer sizes are not identical");
> > > > > > - return -EINVAL;
> > > > > > + ret = -EINVAL;
> > > > > > + goto out;
> > > > > > }
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > priv->cmd_size = cmd_size;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > priv->rsp = priv->cmd;
> > > > > > - return 0;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +out:
> > > > > > + crb_go_idle(dev, priv);
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + return ret;
> > > > > > }
> > > > > >
> > > > > > static int crb_acpi_add(struct acpi_device *device) @@ -416,7
> > > > > > +439,15 @@ static int crb_acpi_add(struct acpi_device *device)
> > > > > > if (rc)
> > > > > > return rc;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - return crb_init(device, priv);
> > > > > > + rc = crb_cmd_ready(dev, priv);
> > > > > > + if (rc)
> > > > > > + return rc;
> > > > >
> > > > > I cannot find any valid reason why crb_map_io calls crb_go_idle
> > > > > in the except in the case of a failure. This is something I complained
> earlier.
> > > >
> > > > Haven't I've already explained that? Each flow has to be enclosed
> > > > by cmdReady and goIdle. There is nothing different here from the
> > > > other flows in that matter. The assumption here is that we are
> > > > starting in the idle state bug because of the HW bug we cannot
> > > > access the registers. So the whole w/o is enclosed in the
> > > > crb_map_io. After that we are starting from new, from the idle state.
> > >
> > > But why you have to do crb_go_idle upon returning from crb_map_io()?
> >
> > As written above it's is closed code... cmdReady <perform the task>
> > goIdle.
>
> It does extra cmdReady/goIdle. I don't really get your explanation here.
> crb_map_io() is not a utility function used after the driver has initialized.
>
> crb_map_io() could just leave it ready so you don't have to do an explicit
> call
> to crb_cmd_ready() in crb_acpi_add. I think this is quite obvious.
>
> > >
> > > > > A minor thing but the extra crb_cmd_ready is basically clutter
> > > > > to the initialization.
> > > >
> > > > The extra cmdReady is here in case runtime pm is not compiled into
> > > > the kernel and assumption here is that we are starting in the idle
> > > > state.
> > > > Please remember that unfortunately we cannot detect whether we are
> > > > in ready on idle state as the status register is not retained, so
> > > > everything has to be ordered properly.
> > >
> > > Rather you it would be better not to use cmdReady/goIdle at all if
> > > kernel is not compiled with CONFIG_PM.
> >
> > ????. You have to do the initial cmdReady, and that's what the code
> > does, otherwise your driver won't work at all. CONFIG_PM is the
> > software thing, it doesn't magically match the HW power state. So you
> > need to do cmdReady.
>
> In every machine that I've tried so far the PTT has worked if cmdReady/goIdle
> haven't been used at all by the OS during a power cycle.
You mean BXT and SKL, right, but that's because you've been blessed with a
specific BIOS that keeps it up.
>
> I'll keep the current commit (v4 version) because it is tested quite well, no
> worries about that, but this is something where a cleanup would make sense
> later on.
No problem, though so far I believe the flow is correct.
Tomas
