Richard A Nelson wrote: > > Any `real` reason you're still at 8.9.3? Current is 8.11.1 > > If you send me a note of the type that fails, (to [EMAIL PROTECTED]), > it'll get received on both a 2.2.18-21/8.11.1 and 2.4.0-test10/8.11.2.Beta0 8.11.1 has problems talking to older sendmails and qmail. I've seen even worse problems on 8.11.1, and backreved it immediately, and the encryption stuff has a lot of build problems on Linux. Jeff > system. > > -- > Rick Nelson > 'Mounten' wird für drei Dinge benutzt: 'Aufsitzen' auf Pferde, 'einklinken' > von Festplatten in Dateisysteme, und, nun, 'besteigen' beim Sex. > -- Christa Keil - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [Fwd: sendmail fai... Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: [Fwd: sendmail fai... Steve VanDevender
- Re: [Fwd: sendmail fai... David Ford
- Re: [Fwd: sendmail fai... Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: [Fwd: sendmail fai... Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: [Fwd: sendmail fai... Henning P. Schmiedehausen
- Re: [Fwd: sendmail fails to del... Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: [Fwd: sendmail fails to del... Horst von Brand
- Re: [Fwd: sendmail fails t... David Ford
- Re: [Fwd: sendmail fails to deliver mail with at... Henning P. Schmiedehausen
- Re: [Fwd: sendmail fails to deliver mail with at... Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: [Fwd: sendmail fails to deliver mail with at... Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: [Fwd: sendmail fails to deliver mail wi... Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: [Fwd: sendmail fails to deliver mail with at... willy tarreau
- Re: [Fwd: sendmail fails to deliver mail wi... Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: [Fwd: sendmail fails to deliver mail with at... Henning P. Schmiedehausen