On 9/29/2016 2:00 PM, Ondrej Zary wrote:
>> The previous two patches were in the right direction.
>> >
>> > Can we also get the same output from 4.6 kernel with the attached patch for
>> > the same machine you sent these?
> Here it is.
>
>> > Something about SCI still doesn't feel right.
>> >
>> > The IRQ assignment fails if the penalty is greater than
>> > PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS. This will happen if BIOS tells us to use an IRQ
>> > and same IRQ is in use by the SCI.
Thanks, I reverted penalize_sci function and dropped patch #1. Can you try this
again?
--
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm
Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux
Foundation Collaborative Project.
>From 7597c656222b27f4cc55c16bab980ed28ef22bbd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sinan Kaya <ok...@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 10:25:21 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ACPI, PCI IRQ: add PCI_USING penalty for ISA interrupts
The change introduced in commit 103544d86976 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: reduce
resource requirements") removed PCI_USING penalty from
acpi_pci_link_allocate function as there is no longer a fixed size penalty
array for both PCI and IRQ interrupts.
We need to add the PCI_USING penalty for ISA interrupts too if the link is
in use and matches our ISA IRQ number.
Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <ok...@codeaurora.org>
---
drivers/acpi/pci_link.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
index c983bf7..a212709 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
@@ -619,6 +619,10 @@ static int acpi_pci_link_allocate(struct acpi_pci_link
*link)
acpi_device_bid(link->device));
return -ENODEV;
} else {
+ if (link->irq.active < ACPI_MAX_ISA_IRQS)
+ acpi_isa_irq_penalty[link->irq.active] +=
+ PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
+
printk(KERN_WARNING PREFIX "%s [%s] enabled at IRQ %d\n",
acpi_device_name(link->device),
acpi_device_bid(link->device), link->irq.active);
--
1.9.1
>From 1835481ebcc5bb649dcc22a2d473fd3b203bf01d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sinan Kaya <ok...@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 15:36:15 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Revert "ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize function"
This reverts commit 9e5ed6d1fb87 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize
function"). SCI penalty API was replaced by the runtime penalty calculation
based on the value of acpi_gbl_FADT.sci_interrupt.
acpi_gbl_FADT.sci_interrupt type does not get updated at the right time
for some platforms and results in incorrect penalty assignment for PCI
IRQs as irq_get_trigger_type returns the wrong type.
Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <ok...@codeaurora.org>
---
arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c | 1 +
drivers/acpi/pci_link.c | 32 +++++++++++++-------------------
include/linux/acpi.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
index 90d84c3..0ffd26e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
@@ -453,6 +453,7 @@ static void __init acpi_sci_ioapic_setup(u8 bus_irq, u16
polarity, u16 trigger,
polarity = acpi_sci_flags & ACPI_MADT_POLARITY_MASK;
mp_override_legacy_irq(bus_irq, polarity, trigger, gsi);
+ acpi_penalize_sci_irq(bus_irq, trigger, polarity);
/*
* stash over-ride to indicate we've been here
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
index a212709..1934e2a 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
@@ -494,27 +494,10 @@ static int acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(int irq)
static int acpi_irq_get_penalty(int irq)
{
- int penalty = 0;
-
- /*
- * Penalize IRQ used by ACPI SCI. If ACPI SCI pin attributes conflict
- * with PCI IRQ attributes, mark ACPI SCI as ISA_ALWAYS so it won't be
- * use for PCI IRQs.
- */
- if (irq == acpi_gbl_FADT.sci_interrupt) {
- u32 type = irq_get_trigger_type(irq) & IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK;
-
- if (type != IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)
- penalty += PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS;
- else
- penalty += PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
- }
-
if (irq < ACPI_MAX_ISA_IRQS)
- return penalty + acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq];
+ return acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq];
- penalty += acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(irq);
- return penalty;
+ return acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(irq);
}
int __init acpi_irq_penalty_init(void)
@@ -885,6 +868,17 @@ bool acpi_isa_irq_available(int irq)
acpi_irq_get_penalty(irq) < PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS);
}
+void acpi_penalize_sci_irq(int irq, int trigger, int polarity)
+{
+ if (irq >= 0 && irq < ARRAY_SIZE(acpi_isa_irq_penalty)) {
+ if (trigger != ACPI_MADT_TRIGGER_LEVEL ||
+ polarity != ACPI_MADT_POLARITY_ACTIVE_LOW)
+ acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] += PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS;
+ else
+ acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] += PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
+ }
+}
+
/*
* Over-ride default table to reserve additional IRQs for use by ISA
* e.g. acpi_irq_isa=5
diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
index 4d8452c..85ac7d5 100644
--- a/include/linux/acpi.h
+++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
@@ -318,6 +318,7 @@ struct pci_dev;
int acpi_pci_irq_enable (struct pci_dev *dev);
void acpi_penalize_isa_irq(int irq, int active);
bool acpi_isa_irq_available(int irq);
+void acpi_penalize_sci_irq(int irq, int trigger, int polarity);
void acpi_pci_irq_disable (struct pci_dev *dev);
extern int ec_read(u8 addr, u8 *val);
--
1.9.1
