* H. Nikolaus Schaller <h...@goldelico.com> [160927 23:50]: > Hi, > > > Am 28.09.2016 um 05:37 schrieb Tony Lindgren <t...@atomide.com>: > > > > * H. Nikolaus Schaller <h...@goldelico.com> [160927 13:11]: > >>> Am 27.09.2016 um 21:49 schrieb Tony Lindgren <t...@atomide.com>: > >>> How about this for defaults: > >>> > >>> - heartbeat for led3 > >>> - cpu0 for led4 > >>> - cpu1 for led5 > >> > >> Good idea. Will try. > >> > >> What I don't exactly know is if these gpios based on an I2C-expander > >> can handle cpu activity triggers or if they are locked up if this i2c > >> processing triggers another cpu activity... > > > > Oh right, if the GPIOs are on the i2c bus > > yes, they are all gpio9 which is the tca6424 on i2c5. > > > it's probably not a good > > idea :) Or at least will be inaccurate if the bus can sleep. > > I have tested a little by writing to /sys/class/leds/.../trigger. > > If I make one LED trigger by "cpu0" it is always on and if I make > a second one triggered by "cpu1" the heartbeat becomes irregular. > > So indeed this does not work.
So should we just leave the default trigger unpopulated then? Regards, Tony
