From: Jamal Hadi Salim <j...@mojatatu.com> Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 08:09:28 -0400
> On 16-09-28 08:07 AM, David Miller wrote: > >> Right, it would be legal for an existing user to have code that >> explicitly initializes every member of the structure, including 'pad'. >> So we have to keep that member around, at a minimum, for their sake. >> > > I think we need to start labelling any new pad fields added as > "Not UAPI. Do not fsck fondle this". They must initialize it to zero.
