Hi Stephen,

2016-09-23 23:47 GMT+02:00 Stephen Boyd <sb...@codeaurora.org>:
> On 09/21, Marcin Wojtas wrote:
>> @@ -203,80 +202,75 @@ static int cp110_syscon_clk_probe(struct 
>> platform_device *pdev)
>>       if (ret)
>>               return ret;
>>
>> -     cp110_clks = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(struct clk *),
>> -                               CP110_CLK_NUM, GFP_KERNEL);
>> -     if (!cp110_clks)
>> -             return -ENOMEM;
>> -
>> -     cp110_clk_data = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
>> -                                   sizeof(*cp110_clk_data),
>> +     cp110_clk_data = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*cp110_clk_data),
>> +                                   sizeof(struct clk_hw *) * CP110_CLK_NUM,
>>                                     GFP_KERNEL);
>
> This doesn't look right. Why are calloc()ing clk_hw_onecell_data this
> way?

After some time, at a first sight it seems I should've used following:
cp110_clk_data = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*cp110_clk_data) +
                                                    sizeof(struct
clk_hw *) * CP110_CLK_NUM,
                                                    GFP_KERNEL);

I'll re-check, but is that what you meant?

Best regards,
Marcin

Reply via email to