Hi Stephen, 2016-09-23 23:47 GMT+02:00 Stephen Boyd <sb...@codeaurora.org>: > On 09/21, Marcin Wojtas wrote: >> @@ -203,80 +202,75 @@ static int cp110_syscon_clk_probe(struct >> platform_device *pdev) >> if (ret) >> return ret; >> >> - cp110_clks = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(struct clk *), >> - CP110_CLK_NUM, GFP_KERNEL); >> - if (!cp110_clks) >> - return -ENOMEM; >> - >> - cp110_clk_data = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, >> - sizeof(*cp110_clk_data), >> + cp110_clk_data = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*cp110_clk_data), >> + sizeof(struct clk_hw *) * CP110_CLK_NUM, >> GFP_KERNEL); > > This doesn't look right. Why are calloc()ing clk_hw_onecell_data this > way?
After some time, at a first sight it seems I should've used following: cp110_clk_data = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*cp110_clk_data) + sizeof(struct clk_hw *) * CP110_CLK_NUM, GFP_KERNEL); I'll re-check, but is that what you meant? Best regards, Marcin