Hi,

>> 4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>>
>> ------------------
>>
>> [ Upstream commit 1382ea631ddddb634850a3795527db0feeff5aaf ]
>>
>> The X-Gene clock driver missed the divider shift operation when
>> set the divider value.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Loc Ho <l...@apm.com>
>> Fixes: 308964caeebc ("clk: Add APM X-Gene SoC clock driver")
>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sb...@codeaurora.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.le...@verizon.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
>> ---
>>  drivers/clk/clk-xgene.c |    3 ++-
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-xgene.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-xgene.c
>> @@ -351,7 +351,8 @@ static int xgene_clk_set_rate(struct clk
>>               /* Set new divider */
>>               data = xgene_clk_read(pclk->param.divider_reg +
>>                               pclk->param.reg_divider_offset);
>> -             data &= ~((1 << pclk->param.reg_divider_width) - 1);
>> +             data &= ~((1 << pclk->param.reg_divider_width) - 1)
>> +                             << pclk->param.reg_divider_shift;
> [...]
>
> This still does the wrong thing when the shift value is non-zero: it
> clears all bits to the right of the divider field in data.  I think the
> correct assignment is:
>
>                 data &= ~(((1 << pclk->param.reg_divider_width) - 1)
>                           << pclk->param.reg_divider_shift);
>

Yes... There was an later patch that address this -
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8458361

-Loc

Reply via email to