Keith Owens wrote:
> Index: 0-test11-pre2.1/arch/i386/kernel/traps.c
> --- 0-test11-pre2.1/arch/i386/kernel/traps.c Fri, 10 Nov 2000 13:10:37 +1100 kaos 
>(linux-2.4/A/c/1_traps.c 1.1.2.2.1.1.2.1.2.3.1.2.3.1.1.2 644)
> +++ 0-test11-pre2.1(w)/arch/i386/kernel/traps.c Fri, 10 Nov 2000 15:56:54 +1100 kaos 
>(linux-2.4/A/c/1_traps.c 1.1.2.2.1.1.2.1.2.3.1.2.3.1.1.2 644)
> @@ -382,6 +382,17 @@ static void unknown_nmi_error(unsigned c
>         printk("Do you have a strange power saving mode enabled?\n");
>  }
> 
> +/*
> + * Unlock any spinlocks which will prevent us from getting the
> + * message out (timerlist_lock is acquired through the
> + * console unblank code)
> + */
> +void bust_spinlocks(void)
> +{
> +       spin_lock_init(&console_lock);
> +       spin_lock_init(&timerlist_lock);
> +}
> +
>  #if CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC
> 
>  int nmi_watchdog = 1;
> @@ -396,17 +407,6 @@ __setup("nmi_watchdog=", setup_nmi_watch
> 
>  extern spinlock_t console_lock, timerlist_lock;
>  static spinlock_t nmi_print_lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;

Did you actually try this?  You are moving bust_spinlocks above the
'extern spinlock_t' declarations intended for it.

My solution was to move the 'extern spinlock_t ...' also :)

        Jeff


-- 
Jeff Garzik             |
Building 1024           | Would you like a Twinkie?
MandrakeSoft            |
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to