On Thu, 2016-09-15 at 16:47 +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > On > I can't say this any more explicitly: > > **************************************************** > * The DT *cannot* know anything about get_cycles() * > **************************************************** > > It's no more complex than that.
Sure think Mark I understand your point. I think to satisfy your objection the most sensible change to make is using arch_timer_get_rate() compared to a desired rate of 19200000. --- bod
