On 06/07, Boris Brezillon wrote: > On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 18:36:21 +0200 > Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.bell...@free-electrons.com> wrote: > > > On 01/06/2016 at 16:15:01 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote : > > > Now that we have clk_hw based provider APIs to register clks, we > > > can get rid of struct clk pointers in this driver, allowing us to > > > move closer to a clear split of consumer and provider clk APIs. > > > > > > Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.bell...@free-electrons.com> > > > Cc: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezil...@free-electrons.com> > > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <stephen.b...@linaro.org> > > > > Well, apart the same comment about alignement: > > > > Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.bell...@free-electrons.com> > > Tested-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.bell...@free-electrons.com> > > Acked-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezil...@free-electrons.com> >
Ok I fixed the alignment and pushed to clk-next. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
