On 09/14, Cheng Chao wrote:
>
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -1063,8 +1063,12 @@ static int migration_cpu_stop(void *data)
> * holding rq->lock, if p->on_rq == 0 it cannot get enqueued because
> * we're holding p->pi_lock.
> */
> - if (task_rq(p) == rq && task_on_rq_queued(p))
> - rq = __migrate_task(rq, p, arg->dest_cpu);
> + if (task_rq(p) == rq) {
> + if (task_on_rq_queued(p))
> + rq = __migrate_task(rq, p, arg->dest_cpu);
> + else
> + p->wake_cpu = arg->dest_cpu;
> + }
Cough ;) again, I leave this to Peter...
But imo this change should be documented or perhaps even separated.
It looks fine to me, but this has nothing to do with "we can avoid
a sleep+wakeup by doing a preemption" from the changelog.
This is another improvement, and a small note in the changelog can
unconfuse the reader of git blame/log.
Oleg.
