On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 06:47:40PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote: > Ok. Issue settled. So 'rep nop' is safe. Ok that can get into the spinlocks > for 2.2.18 Just curious... What does "rep nop" actually accomplish, anyway? Simon- [ Stormix Technologies Inc. ][ NetNation Communications Inc. ] [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ][ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] [ Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of my employers. ] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Pentium 4 and 2.4/2.5 Alan Cox
- Re: Pentium 4 and 2.4/2.5 Linus Torvalds
- Re: Pentium 4 and 2.4/2.5 Linus Torvalds
- Re: Pentium 4 and 2.4/2.5 Alan Cox
- Re: Pentium 4 and 2.4/2.5 Linus Torvalds
- Re: Pentium 4 and 2.4/2.5 Alan Cox
- Re: Pentium 4 and 2.4/2.5 Brian Pomerantz
- Re: Pentium 4 and 2.4/2.5 Alan Cox
- Re: Pentium 4 and 2.4/2.5 kernel
- Re: Pentium 4 and 2.4/2.5 Alan Cox
- Re: Pentium 4 and 2.4/2.5 Simon Kirby
- Re: Pentium 4 and 2.4/2.5 Brian Pomerantz
- Re: Pentium 4 and 2.4/2.5 Robert M. Love
- Re: Pentium 4 and 2.4/2.5 Alan Cox
- Re: Pentium 4 and 2.4/2.5 Frank Davis
- Re: Pentium 4 and 2.4/2.5 Alan Cox