4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
[ Upstream commit e00e23bceba48a8f0c94fefe26948404cbd43d0a ]
This patch addresses two issues.
First is the fact that the fm10k_mbx_free_irq was assuming msix_entries was
valid and that will not always be the case. As such we need to add a check
for if it is NULL.
Second is the fact that we weren't freeing the IRQ if the mailbox API
returned an error on trying to connect.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <adu...@mirantis.com>
Reviewed-by: Bruce Allan <bruce.w.al...@intel.com>
Tested-by: Krishneil Singh <krishneil.k.si...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirs...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.le...@verizon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k_pci.c | 13 +++++++++++--
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k_pci.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k_pci.c
@@ -1122,6 +1122,10 @@ void fm10k_mbx_free_irq(struct fm10k_int
struct fm10k_hw *hw = &interface->hw;
int itr_reg;
+ /* no mailbox IRQ to free if MSI-X is not enabled */
+ if (!interface->msix_entries)
+ return;
+
/* disconnect the mailbox */
hw->mbx.ops.disconnect(hw, &hw->mbx);
@@ -1444,10 +1448,15 @@ int fm10k_mbx_request_irq(struct fm10k_i
err = fm10k_mbx_request_irq_pf(interface);
else
err = fm10k_mbx_request_irq_vf(interface);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
/* connect mailbox */
- if (!err)
- err = hw->mbx.ops.connect(hw, &hw->mbx);
+ err = hw->mbx.ops.connect(hw, &hw->mbx);
+
+ /* if the mailbox failed to connect, then free IRQ */
+ if (err)
+ fm10k_mbx_free_irq(interface);
return err;
}
