> hi, > I had discussion with Ingo about the state of this patchset > and there's one more requirement from his side - to split > event files into per topic files
Thanks Jiri. > > I made some initial changes over latest Sukadev's branch > and came up with something like this: Did you just split it by the "Topic" fields? > > $ find pmu-events/arch/x86/ > pmu-events/arch/x86/ > pmu-events/arch/x86/NehalemEX_core > pmu-events/arch/x86/NehalemEX_core/Memory.json > pmu-events/arch/x86/NehalemEX_core/Virtual-Memory.json > pmu-events/arch/x86/NehalemEX_core/Cache.json > pmu-events/arch/x86/NehalemEX_core/Pipeline.json > pmu-events/arch/x86/NehalemEX_core/Floating-point.json > pmu-events/arch/x86/NehalemEX_core/Other.json > pmu-events/arch/x86/mapfile.csv > pmu-events/arch/x86/Broadwell_core > pmu-events/arch/x86/Broadwell_core/Memory.json > pmu-events/arch/x86/Broadwell_core/Virtual-Memory.json > pmu-events/arch/x86/Broadwell_core/Cache.json > pmu-events/arch/x86/Broadwell_core/Pipeline.json > pmu-events/arch/x86/Broadwell_core/Floating-point.json > pmu-events/arch/x86/Broadwell_core/Other.json > pmu-events/arch/x86/Broadwell_core/Frontend.json > > so let's have a discussion if this is acceptable for you guys Splitting is fine for me, as long as it's scriptable. I already have some scripts to generate the perf json files, can update them to split. > > I've already made some changes in pmu-events/* to support > this hierarchy to see how bad the change would be.. and > it's not that bad ;-) Everything has to be automated, please no manual changes. -Andi
