On 31-08-16, 03:11, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com>
>
> Since cpufreq_policy_alloc() doesn't use its dev variable for
> anything useful, drop that variable from there along with the
> NULL check against it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 4 ----
> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -1073,13 +1073,9 @@ static void handle_update(struct work_st
>
> static struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_policy_alloc(unsigned int cpu)
> {
> - struct device *dev = get_cpu_device(cpu);
> struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
> int ret;
>
> - if (WARN_ON(!dev))
> - return NULL;
> -
> policy = kzalloc(sizeof(*policy), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!policy)
> return NULL;
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>
--
viresh
