Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>
> On Wed, 8 Nov 2000, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> > Patch looks generally ok. Some of the whitespace/formatting changes are
> > questionable, I usually leave that up to the maintainer unless it is
> > very gratuitously opposite to CodingStyle.
> >
>
> These drivers seem to be unmantained :)
> Anyway if this is a problem I can undo these changes ...
I don't have any problem with them. Make sure you CC the individual
maintainers of the drivers... some of the pop up every now and then :)
> > Some of the driver messages ("foo version 1.0") are purposefully printed
> > -after-, not before, the device is probed and registered. Your patch
> > gets this wrong in at least one place.
> >
>
> Yes... I wasn't sure about this... can undo...
When in doubt, follow the behavior of the existing driver. :)
Especially since we're in a freeze, and stuff...
--
Jeff Garzik |
Building 1024 | Would you like a Twinkie?
MandrakeSoft |
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
