Hi,
I just wanted to kindly remind about this patch.
Best regards,
Grzegorz
2016-07-21 12:43 GMT+02:00 Grzegorz Jaszczyk <j...@semihalf.com>:
> There is no need to implement subroutine for suspend since there is no
> data to store before suspending.
>
> Signed-off-by: Grzegorz Jaszczyk <j...@semihalf.com>
> ---
> drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c
> b/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c
> index ae75328..65f9838 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c
> @@ -304,12 +304,26 @@ static int armada_thermal_exit(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int armada_thermal_resume(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct thermal_zone_device *thermal =
> + dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> + struct armada_thermal_priv *priv = thermal->devdata;
> +
> + priv->data->init_sensor(to_platform_device(dev), priv);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(armada_thermal_pm_ops, NULL, armada_thermal_resume);
> +
> static struct platform_driver armada_thermal_driver = {
> .probe = armada_thermal_probe,
> .remove = armada_thermal_exit,
> .driver = {
> .name = "armada_thermal",
> .of_match_table = armada_thermal_id_table,
> + .pm = &armada_thermal_pm_ops,
> },
> };
>
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
