On 08/10/16 at 02:53pm, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Baoquan He <b...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > It won't impact the result, we still should fix the code bug.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <b...@redhat.com>
> > Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <r...@rjwysocki.net>
> > Cc: Len Brown <len.br...@intel.com>
> > Cc: Pavel Machek <pa...@ucw.cz>
> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mi...@redhat.com>
> > Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <h...@zytor.com>
> > Cc: x...@kernel.org
> > Cc: linux...@vger.kernel.org
> > ---
> > arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> > index 90d84c3..2b25d3f 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> > @@ -1031,8 +1031,8 @@ static int __init acpi_parse_madt_lapic_entries(void)
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > - x2count = madt_proc[0].count;
> > - count = madt_proc[1].count;
> > + count = madt_proc[0].count;
> > + x2count = madt_proc[1].count;
> > }
> > if (!count && !x2count) {
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I mean here the value checking won't be impacted by the wrong
assignment.
> > printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "No LAPIC entries present\n");
>
> Why does this bug have no effect?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ingo
