On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 06:44:09PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 04:33:34PM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm resending Sebastian's sysv msg queue use of wake_qs but updated > > to the last observations I need wrt the need of explicit barriers > > after removing the whole receiver busy-looping. After some irc exchange > > it seems we're both on the same page, and things now look like he had > > them earlier, in v2. This is all patch 1. > > > > The rest of the patches are changes I noticed while reviewing patch 1, > > which are mainly sender-side rework/optimizations. Details are in each > > changelog. > > > > The changes have survived ltp (which has some nasty corner cases for msgsnd > > changes), as well as pmsg-shared benchmark. > > Not really my area, but over all the patches look good. > > Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <pet...@infradead.org>
Andrew, will you pick these up, or should I route then through tip/locking or something?
