- Remove outdated comment
- Use cpu_relax() in a busy loop

Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

---
 arch/i386/kernel/smp.c |    5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Index: linux/arch/i386/kernel/smp.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/arch/i386/kernel/smp.c
+++ linux/arch/i386/kernel/smp.c
@@ -375,8 +375,7 @@ static void flush_tlb_others(cpumask_t c
        /*
         * i'm not happy about this global shared spinlock in the
         * MM hot path, but we'll see how contended it is.
-        * Temporarily this turns IRQs off, so that lockups are
-        * detected by the NMI watchdog.
+        * AK: x86-64 has a faster method that could be ported.
         */
        spin_lock(&tlbstate_lock);
        
@@ -401,7 +400,7 @@ static void flush_tlb_others(cpumask_t c
 
        while (!cpus_empty(flush_cpumask))
                /* nothing. lockup detection does not belong here */
-               mb();
+               cpu_relax();
 
        flush_mm = NULL;
        flush_va = 0;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to