On Monday, 12 February 2007 00:06, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > Hi. > > On Sun, 2007-02-11 at 19:53 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > Having drivers explicitly marked as to whether they are safe is a good > > > kernel > > > feature; what to do if they're not is policy. > > > > That's true, but I assume that the people who opt for doing that are also > > willing to take part in the review of the drivers. :-) > > Absolutely :) > > > Well, I don't think so. Let's estimate the number of drivers that define > > .resume() right now: > > > > $ grep -I -l -r '.resume =' linux-2.6.20/drivers/ | wc > > 102 102 4169 > > I think the '.resume =' doesn't help - some have tabs. I ran '\.resume' > and got 351.
Ah, good catch. I have searched for ".resume" only and got 612, but this is the number of files, not the number of drivers. And it is not exactly large. ;-) > It would be interesting to see how many struct pci_driver etc instances > lack resume methods. Yes, I'll try to invent a test. Greetings, Rafael - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
