On Feb 9 2007 15:22, Andrew Morton wrote:
>On Fri, 09 Feb 2007 14:53:44 -0800
>Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> This is the core of the read-only bind mount patch set.
>
>Who wants read-only bind mounts, and for what reason?

And another case could be, that some application modifies ~/.xyz, but the user
(with root's help) does not want that:

  mount --bind -r ~/.xyz ~/.xyz

chmoding out the w bits does not always work, as programs might tamper with the
permissions of ~/.xyz itself... so a ro mount seems to be best.


Jan
-- 
ft: http://freshmeat.net/p/chaostables/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to