On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 11:06:43AM -0500, ttha...@opensource.altera.com wrote:
> From: Thor Thayer <ttha...@opensource.altera.com>
>
> Add Altera Arria10 NAND FIFO memory EDAC support.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thor Thayer <ttha...@opensource.altera.com>
> ---
> drivers/edac/Kconfig | 7 +++++++
> drivers/edac/altera_edac.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
...
> @@ -1589,7 +1619,9 @@ static int altr_edac_a10_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
> else if ((of_device_is_compatible(child,
> "altr,socfpga-a10-ocram-ecc")) ||
> (of_device_is_compatible(child,
> - "altr,socfpga-eth-mac-ecc")))
> + "altr,socfpga-eth-mac-ecc")) ||
> + (of_device_is_compatible(child,
> + "altr,socfpga-nand-ecc")))
> altr_edac_a10_device_add(edac, child);
> else if (of_device_is_compatible(child,
> "altr,sdram-edac-a10"))
Can we simplify this loop like this?
for_each_child_of_node(pdev->dev.of_node, child) {
if (!of_device_is_available(child))
continue;
if (of_device_is_compatible(child, "altr,socfpga-a10-l2-ecc") ||
of_device_is_compatible(child,
"altr,socfpga-a10-ocram-ecc") ||
of_device_is_compatible(child, "altr,socfpga-eth-mac-ecc")
||
of_device_is_compatible(child, "altr,socfpga-nand-ecc"))
altr_edac_a10_device_add(edac, child);
else if (of_device_is_compatible(child, "altr,sdram-edac-a10"))
of_platform_populate(pdev->dev.of_node,
altr_sdram_ctrl_of_match,
NULL, &pdev->dev);
}
I've merged the first "if" and subsequent "else if" because they all
do altr_edac_a10_device_add(edac, child) and added spacing for better
readability.
Look ok?
Or have I fatfingered it?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
