On Wednesday, July 27, 2016 1:25:33 AM CEST Rich Felker wrote: > On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 02:31:29PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > The CLOCKSOURCE_OF_DECLARE now takes a function that returns an 'int', but > > a this > > new clocksource driver has just appeared in linux-next and causes a warning > > because > > it has the old 'void' return value: > > > > In file included from ../include/linux/clocksource.h:18:0, > > from ../include/linux/clockchips.h:13, > > from ../drivers/clocksource/jcore-pit.c:14: > > include/linux/of.h:1006:20: error: comparison of distinct pointer types > > lacks a cast [-Werror] > > .data = (fn == (fn_type)NULL) ? fn : fn } > > ^ > > > > This adapts the jcore_pit_init() function to the correct return type. > > > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> > > Fixes: e0aa0655c60b ("clocksource: add J-Core timer/clocksource driver") > > --- > > The patch that introduces the warnign currently only exists in the linux-sh > > git > > tree and showed up in linux-next this week. > > I've removed the commit from my for-next branch since it's not > appropriate to go upstream through my tree. Your patch should still be > applied in the proper subsystem tree, though, I think. Daniel?
I think the way to do it now is to fold my patch into your driver and submit it to the clocksource git on top of the API change. Arnd