Hi. On Sat, 2007-02-10 at 03:42 +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 08:57:49AM +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > > > Can we start to NAK new drivers that don't have proper power management > > implemented? There really is no excuse for writing a new driver and not > > putting .suspend and .resume methods in anymore, is there? > > The PCI layer is able to deal with drivers that have no PM methods in > the most simple case.
Yeah. I suppose we could use a pm_safe bit flag in struct device_driver and/or struct pci_driver. I have other things to do right now, but will seek to understand the relationship between those structs better later. Regards, Nigel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
