On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
>Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2000 12:11:57 +0000 (GMT)
>From: Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: Keith Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Cc: Tomasz Motylewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Subject: Re: ide-probe.c:400: `rtc_lock' undeclared and
> /lib/modules/..../build
>
>> Agreed, I was unhappy that the build symlink was added to 2.2 kernels.
>> Now you need modutils >= 2.3.14 for 2.2 kernels :(. But nobody asks
>> me, I'm just the kernel module.[ch] and modutils maintainer.
>
>Actually they do. I agree that it wants sorting. Im just wondering what the
>best approach is - maybe check modutils rev and only add the link if its high
>enough ?
What if build-machine != machine-kernel-was-built-for?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE: My new email address is: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mike A. Harris - Linux advocate - Open source advocate
Computer Consultant - Capslock Consulting
Copyright 2000 all rights reserved
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored."
- Aldous Huxley
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
