On Fri, 9 Feb 2007 18:37:34 +0100 (CET) Roman Zippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, > > On Fri, 9 Feb 2007, Heiko Carstens wrote: > > > And indeed all the __initdata annotated local and global variables on > > s390 are in the init.data section. So I'm wondering what this patch > > series is about. Or I must have missed something. > > I think it reaches back to times when gcc 2.7.* was still supported, which > does behave as described in the documentation. gcc 2.95 and newer don't > require explicit initialization anymore, so this has become a non-issue. > Yes, nobody's been observing any problems arising from this, and if this memory was really uninitialised, people would be hitting problems. I don't want to have to require that all __attribute__((section)) storage be initialised - people will surely forget to do it and things will slip through. If we really do have a problem here it'd be better to fix it in some central and global fashion: either by ensuring that each architecture's startup code will zero this memory or by some compiler/linker option such as -fno-common. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
