On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 03:35:34PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: [] > there's a difference between NACKing my changes because the patch > breaks things versus because you think the whole system should be > taking some other form.
After all, i was giving negative acknowledgement to only-good-branch orientation of the patch, and ease of having current script working by setting up *your* environment. Try to Cc one of maintainers of archs, where this script is used, to have positive ack. > so if you dont like the mkuboot.sh script, fine, have at it with > rewriting the system ... otherwise the patch i proposed should > continue on for inclusion. Goodbye. ____ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
