On Fri 09-02-07 01:40:31, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
> Jan Kara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> FAT has to fill the hole completely, but DIO doesn't seems to do.
> >>
> >> e.g.
> >> fd = open("file", O_WRONLY | O_CREAT | O_TRUNC);
> >> write(fd, buf, 512);
> >> lseek(fd, 10000, SEEK_SET);
> >> write(fd, buf, 512);
> >>
> >> We need to allocate the blocks on 512 ~ 10000, and fill it with zero.
> >> However, I think DIO doesn't fill it. If I'm missing something, please
> >> let me know, I'll kill that check.
> > I know. DIO doesn't do it. But the point is that if blockdev_direct_IO
> > finds out it should allocate new blocks, it exits without allocating them.
> > Then in __generic_file_aio_write_nolock() if we find out that we did not
> > write everything in generic_file_direct_write(), we just call
> > generic_file_buffered_write() to write the unwritten part.
> > Hence, in case you describe above, the second write() finds out that
> > block is not allocated and eventually everything falls back to calling
> > generic_file_buffered_write() which calls prepare_write() and everything is
> > happy.
>
> I see. But sorry, I can't see where is preventing it... Finally, I
> think we do the following on second write(2).
>
> This is write, so create == 1, and ->lock_type == DIO_LOCKING,
> and dio->block_in_file > ->i_size, so DIO callback fat_get_block() with
> create == 1.
I think you misread the code - see below.
> Then fat_get_block() seems to allocate block without fill hole,
> because it can't know caller is prepre_write or not...
> Well, anyway I'll test it on weekend. Thanks.
>
> -> blockdev_direct_IO()
> -> direct_io_worker()
> -> do_direct_IO()
> -> get_more_blocks()
>
> create = dio->rw & WRITE;
Here, create == 1.
> if (dio->lock_type == DIO_LOCKING) {
> if (dio->block_in_file < (i_size_read(dio->inode) >>
> dio->blkbits))
> create = 0;
But here create was reset back to 0 - exactly because
dio->block_in_file > i_size...
Honza
--
Jan Kara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
SuSE CR Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
