On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 10:51:23AM -0400, David Long wrote:
> On 07/15/2016 06:57 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 12:35:45PM -0400, David Long wrote:
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h
> > > @@ -74,6 +74,7 @@
> > > #define COMPAT_PT_DATA_ADDR 0x10004
> > > #define COMPAT_PT_TEXT_END_ADDR 0x10008
> > > #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> > > +#include <linux/bug.h>
> > >
> > > /* sizeof(struct user) for AArch32 */
> > > #define COMPAT_USER_SZ 296
> > > @@ -119,6 +120,8 @@ struct pt_regs {
> > > u64 syscallno;
> > > };
> > >
> > > +#define MAX_REG_OFFSET offsetof(struct pt_regs, pstate)
> > > +
> > > #define arch_has_single_step() (1)
> > >
> > > #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> > > @@ -147,6 +150,55 @@ struct pt_regs {
> > > #define user_stack_pointer(regs) \
> > > (!compat_user_mode(regs) ? (regs)->sp : (regs)->compat_sp)
> > >
> > > +extern int regs_query_register_offset(const char *name);
> > > +extern const char *regs_query_register_name(unsigned int offset);
> >
> > Is regs_query_register_offset() used anywhere? I grep'ed the kernel with
> > these patches applied but couldn't find any use.
>
> It's referenced in kernel/trace/trace_probe.c.
I meant regs_query_register_name() (vim completion wrote the first one).
> > > +extern bool regs_within_kernel_stack(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long
> > > addr);
> >
> > This one only seems to be used in arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c. Can we
> > make it static and remove the declaration?
>
> OK.
I can change it locally.
Are these going to be used in the future by uprobes?
--
Catalin
