On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 02:46 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > was ufs_fs.h purposefully not exported to userspace or did it just slip > through the cracks ? assuming the latter scenario, the attached patch > touches up the relationship between ufs_fs.h and its sub headers (like > ufs_fs_sb.h) so that we can export it ... the silo bootloader takes advantage > of this header for example
are you sure it actually uses anything from this header, and not just assumes the magic number to be there?? (also.. I kind of would think it reasonable for things with their own UFS fs reader to have their own header) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
