On Thursday 08 February 2007 09:00, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 08:49:41 +0100 Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > This panic(hang) was found by a numa test-set on a system with 3 nodes, > > > where > > > node(2) was memory-less-node. > > > > I still think it's the wrong fix -- just get rid of the memory less node. > > "Let's break it even more"?
I still don't get what you believe what would be broken then. > > I expect you'll likely run into more problems with that setup anyways. > > What happens if he doesn't run into more problems? Then he's lucky. I ran into problems at least when I still had the empty nodes some time ago on x86-64. Christoph said SN2 is doing the same. iirc slab blew up at least, but that might be fixed by now. But it's a little risky because there is more code now that is node aware. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
