On Wed, 13 Jul 2016, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > The ordering Paul has, namely 0,1 for core0,smt{0,1} is not something
> > I've ever seen on an Intel part. AMD otoh does enumerate their CMT stuff
> > like what Paul has.
>
> That's more the natural 'direct' mapping from CPU internal topology to CPU
> id:
> what's close to each other physically is close to each other in the CPU id
> space
> as well.
But does it correctly reflect the hardware? That seems to be the real
question...
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
Henrique Holschuh
