On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 10:26:56 +1100, "Neil Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Tuesday February 6, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > This patch should fix the worst of the offences, but I'd like to > > experiment and think a bit more before I submit it to stable. > > And probably test it too - as yet I have only compile and brain > > tested. > > Ok, I've experimented and tested and now I know what was causing the > double-unlock. > > The following patch is suitable for 2.6.20.1 and mainline. There is > room for a bit more improvement, but only for performance, not > correctness. I'll look into that later. > > Thanks, > NeilBrown
I figure I should test this on my hardware, but since the RAID array resynched itself when I rebooted back into an earlier kernel version, I'm guessing it means this bug introduced some corruption into the array, when it occurred, so I'd like some pointers on how I can test it out without compromising my data. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
