On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 3:13 AM, Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org> wrote: > > * Stephen Rothwell <s...@canb.auug.org.au> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in: >> >> arch/x86/kernel/x86_init.c >> >> between commit: >> >> 255303026193 ("x86: apply more __ro_after_init and const") >> >> from the kspp tree and commit: > > Kees, did you plan to submit this patch (and any other pending x86 patches) > to the > x86 tree?
I already submitted it, but since it was part of the __ro_after_init work which was cross-architecture, it seemed best to carry it separately. I'm happy to do whatever you'd like. -Kees -- Kees Cook Brillo & Chrome OS Security