On 07/09/2016 11:23 AM, Randy Li wrote:
> The device data for samsung,exynos3250-rtc and samsung,s3c6410-rtc
> are just have a difference, but keeping using the same device data
> would cause the platform using the other IP core not work.
I cannot understand what you wanted to say here. Please rephrase it.
Why not just reverting a42e6eae457837d6a5925f4926f5ba05ccf44f89?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
>
> Signed-off-by: Randy Li <ay...@soulik.info>
> ---
> drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c
> index 5dc18ca..e9f6151 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c
> @@ -810,6 +810,18 @@ static struct s3c_rtc_data const s3c6410_rtc_data = {
> .disable = s3c6410_rtc_disable,
> };
>
> +static struct s3c_rtc_data const exynos3250_rtc_data = {
> + .max_user_freq = 32768,
> + .needs_src_clk = true,
> + .irq_handler = s3c6410_rtc_irq,
> + .set_freq = s3c6410_rtc_setfreq,
> + .enable_tick = s3c6410_rtc_enable_tick,
> + .save_tick_cnt = s3c6410_rtc_save_tick_cnt,
> + .restore_tick_cnt = s3c6410_rtc_restore_tick_cnt,
> + .enable = s3c24xx_rtc_enable,
> + .disable = s3c6410_rtc_disable,
> +};
> +
> static const struct of_device_id s3c_rtc_dt_match[] = {
> {
> .compatible = "samsung,s3c2410-rtc",
> @@ -825,7 +837,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id s3c_rtc_dt_match[] = {
> .data = (void *)&s3c6410_rtc_data,
> }, {
> .compatible = "samsung,exynos3250-rtc",
> - .data = (void *)&s3c6410_rtc_data,
> + .data = (void *)&exynos3250_rtc_data,
> },
> { /* sentinel */ },
> };
>
