On Wed, 6 Jul 2016 09:53:24 -0400 Julien Desfossez <jdesfos...@efficios.com> wrote:
> > I'm not convinced this should be needed. I hate adding back to back > > tracepoints. > > Indeed, having two tracepoints back to back is not pretty. We placed it > here to get the priority of the newly created threads. Maybe a more > appropriate way of doing that would be to extend the sched_process_fork > tracepoint to output the same scheduling informations. Would you prefer > that option ? That may be a possibility. Let's see what Peter thinks. -- Steve
