"Lu, Yinghai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Eric, > > How about let apic_hangle_pending_vector take the irq too?
We can't compute the vector by reading the hardware registers after we have acknowledged the irq. I hope that was the answer you were looking for I'm not quite certain what you mean by take. > I wonder if there any chance that you have two IRQ_MOVE_PENDING? I'm not quite certain what you are asking on the face of it there is one bit per irq so it is impossible. I don't think we can get into any trouble we don't let a vector be reused on a cpu until we know it isn't in irr. So even if things come in highly out of order the should still function. I also have seen irqs migrate on nearly every irq received. Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
