Suraj Jitindar Singh <sjitindarsi...@gmail.com> writes:
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/opal.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/opal.h
> @@ -276,6 +276,14 @@ extern int opal_error_code(int rc);
>  
>  ssize_t opal_msglog_copy(char *to, loff_t pos, size_t count);
>  
> +static inline int opal_get_async_rc(struct opal_msg msg)
> +{
> +     if (msg.msg_type != OPAL_MSG_ASYNC_COMP)
> +             return OPAL_PARAMETER;

Should instead be WARN_ON or BUG_ON ? Is there *ever* a situation where
calling opal_get_async_rc on a non-OPAL_MSG_ASYNC_COMP is a not both a
dumb idea and a bug?

otherwise (including if above change is made)
Acked-by: Stewart Smith <stew...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>


-- 
Stewart Smith
OPAL Architect, IBM.

Reply via email to